Medical Tourism and the Risks of Air Travel – Airtravel during Pregnancy
In this part VI of the “medical tourism and the risk of air travel” – series, I want to touch on flying when pregnant.
If you have not read the other post, you may want to do so by clicking here.
Traveling by plane when pregnant is probably the most comfortable way to journey and it has been shown that the changes in oxygen pressure during the flight have little effect on the fetus. In fact, some airlines allow airline staff to continue to work on board of a plane up to 6 months of pregnancy.
However, there are some things to keep in mind:
For increased comfort, it is recommended that pregnant women abstain from gas producing foods at minimum one day before the flight. It is already crowded in your abdomen. All you need now is being bloated during a flight.
If you often feel nauseous during the early phase of your pregnancy, this may increase during a flight. Talk to your doctor if medication that reduces the feeling of nausea might be right for you.
One thing to definitely avoid is any trauma to the abdomen during the flight. Thus, it is recommended that pregnant passengers wear their seat belts all the time when seated as “… turbulent air can occur suddenly and unexpectedly.” If you have travelled by air as much as I have, you will know that such turbulent air can indeed be rough and cause injury if you are not in your seat with your seat belt fastened.
Afore mentioned is a bit of a chicken and egg situation, though. On the one hand, during late pregnancy you suffer from compression of your bowel and your abdominal blood vessels due to the large uterus, possibly resulting in swelling of the legs, deep vein thrombosis or thrombophlebitis, which would suggest that moving about the aircraft every hour or so is a good thing to do. On the other hand, you want to avoid injury due to turbulent air that surprises you during your stroll in the cabin. I suggest you be extra careful when you move about, hold on to the back of the seats, and return to your seat at any sign of turbulent air. It is also a good idea to request an aisle seat, so getting up becomes easy and you don’t have to climb over your fellow passengers as much.
If you have suffered from venous thrombo-embolism in the past or are prone to venous thrombosis you need to discuss your flight plans with your local primary care physician. He or she may decide to put you on short term anti-coagulants.
If your blood has a reduced capacity to carry oxygen due to e.g. anemia, it is again advisable to discuss your travel plan with your physician at home.
Finally, if you are pregnant in week 36, you should check with your airline if they will allow you to fly, particularly if it is a long distance flight. You also check that your destination does not represent a health hazard to your baby, should you be forced to give birth away from home. But if you travel in week 36, it may just be you desire to deliver your baby in another country which is something many women do.
With that said: safe travels.
This is part five of my blog series on air medical tourism and the risks associated with air travel.
You may want to go back and read parts I – IV, also.
Originally, I wanted to break this subject down into three parts, however, the more research I did on the subject, the more I realized that I would not fit all into three posts, particularly with my self-imposed 500 word per post limit (which I struggle to adhere to).
Today’s post will deal mainly with pulmonary diseases and their impact on patients’ well being during a flight.
As a general rule, any patients with pulmonary diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, neuromuscular disease effecting the lungs, pulmonary infections, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, or pulmonary vascular conditions should receive clearance for flight by a medical doctor, prior to boarding an aircraft.
The physician will try to establish how much the pulmonary disease affects the patient during the flight, if the provision of oxygen during the flight is sufficient to remedy the symptoms, based on the predicted altitude and the duration of the flight. Lung function tests and blood gas analysis are main parameters during such examination.
A single and very practical test is to see if the patient can walk for about 50 meters or climb a flight of stairs at normal speed, without becoming significantly short breathed.
Patients that cannot pass this test, and are still cleared for flight, should consider booking a wheelchair or electronic cart service at the airport and avoid smoking areas (in those few airports where the still exist), also, plan enough time between connection flights, so you arrive a the gate relatively relaxed.
Here are some common pulmonary diseases and precautions for air travel (I cannot cover all, so if in doubt, contact your medical doctor, which you should do anyway):
Bronchial Asthma: if your asthma is unstable, sever, and has caused recent hospitalization, air travel may be contraindicated. For asthma patients that are cleared for flight it is vital that they carry their asthma medication on board and store it somewhere easy to reach (which in most cases is not the overhead bin).
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: if cleared for flight by a medical doctor, in flight oxygen may be required. It is important to point out, that you cannot bring your own oxygen tank on board. Therefore, it is necessary that you contact the airline before, in order to find out if they provide oxygen, and if they do, to ensure that it is available during your flight.
Bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis: require good infection prevention measures, hydration, effective cough and medical oxygen therapy during the flight. Here it may be necessary that your doctor contacts the airline’s medical department in order to plan personal requirements during the flight.
Pulmonary infections: Patients with active and contagious infections (e.g. Pneumonia, Tuberculosis) may not travel by plane.
Pneumothorax: a pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum must be corrected before flight.
Pleural effusion: must be drained and corrected at least 14 days before flight. An X-ray of the thorax prior to flight needs to confirm that there is no accumulation of new fluid.
Pulmonary vascular disease: Patients with pre-existing pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension may suffer from a worsening of the hypertension and reduced cardiac output. Anticoagulation of the blood, medical oxygen, and restricted exercise may help reduce risks. A medical doctor must evaluate your fit for flight status before boarding a flight.
As you can see, pulmonary conditions and air travel is a tricky combination. It is highly recommended that you seek advice of a physician experienced with both as he/she will review your individual case and make recommendations suitable for your particular conditions.
If you are planning a medical trip and are unsure about your lung condition, discuss your case with a medical travel facilitator. They should be able to point you into the right direction in terms of which doctor should pre-evaluate your condition.
In our practice we see patients travelling abroad for medical treatment for a number of reasons. Most commonly these are:
- Elective aesthetic, such as dental or plastic surgery
- A real medical need requiring treatment (elective and emergency)
- Patients who could not be helped adequately at home (either due to the illness being chronic, incurable, or even terminal.
We have a fair share of patients that fall into the last category. These patients pose particular challenges for a medical travel consultant due to the following reasons:
- They have expectations for a cure that in most cases cannot be met
- Their families may “drag” them to treatment, even though the patient may not want this.
- If a treatment is indeed possible, it will most likely be a lengthy process and not a matter of flying to the treatment center, receiving treatment, and returning home a week later.
These cases, much more than any other in medical travel, require the close communication of all involved parties, in particular between doctor in the treating center, and the doctor who will continue the treatment at home (as outlined in my blog on physician to physician communication)
Why is this so important?
Let us take a cancer patient as an example: A patient is diagnosed with a malignant type of cancer that requires urgent surgical removal, followed by several courses of chemo-therapy.
Medical travel is possible in this case, and it may make sense to travel to a super specialized oncology center. There, the surgery can be performed. However, what about the chemotherapy? Chemotherapy is usually a process that happens over several weeks and months. In an ideal world, the patient would stay near the oncology center and go through all chemotherapy cycles under the supervision of the specialist oncologist.
Unfortunately, most patients cannot afford such a lengthy stay abroad and want to travel home after surgery. This means the chemo-therapy must be started at home. While this is possible, it requires that the patient is compliant with the requirements and a medical doctor is available at home who can implement the chemo-therapy based on the recommendation of the expert oncologist.
Good medical travel planning is required in these cases.
It will be more complex, if the cancer has already advanced to a point, where it is not treatable anymore. These are not good cases for medical travel. However, in some instances, it may make sense to get a second opinion by an oncology expert, particularly with regards to the treatment recommendations and procedures. In these cases, the treatment focuses on extending and improving quality of life.
If the patient’s medical files are complete, travel may not even be required. If they are incomplete, travel for a diagnostic work up is mandatory.
The same applies for chronic illness, as this too, requires long time management which does not make it ideal for medical travel.
In all of the above cases good medical travel planning and follow up care is required for such a trip to be successful.
Learn more about cancer treatment in Germany
There is not a single day that goes by during which we don’t receive an email containing the line:
“I am looking for the best Doctor in Germany.” (our company manages inbound medical travel to Germany)
It is all too understandable why we are looking for the best doctor. After all, health is one of our most valuable assets.
However, there are several fundamental issues with the search for “The Best”
For one: How does one measure what is truly “The best”. Secondly: is what is the best for one, really the best for the other?
The first question (how do you measure what really is the best) already opens Pandora’s Box of possible answers:
Are we talking about the best surgical skills, the best diagnostic skills, graduation from a high profile medical school, the best treatment results, the smallest number of malpractice cases, the largest amount of published studies… the list goes on…
What defines “The Best?”
Purely from a language and grammar point of view, the best implies that someone or something is better than all of the rest. By definition of the word, there can only be one (doctor) who is the best.
How does one go about measuring who is the best doctor? To my knowledge, there is no institution or government body, who measures the quality of a doctor using validated procedures to evaluate and ensure quality (if I am mistaken, I am happy to be informed otherwise).
Essentially, a patient is on his/her own, when trying to find “the best doctor”.
Most of us don’t have the required background and knowledge how to evaluate the quality of work a medical doctor delivers. So we turn to so called proxies, or replacement measures, that should help us evaluate who the best doctor is. Searching the web on this subject you will find recommendations like: is the receptionist friendly, is the exam room clean, does the doctor look well groomed, does he/she have good bedside manners, is he friendly, does she take the time to answer questions?
Is this a list of qualities that make a good doctor… that make the best doctor?
As an example: We have a surgeon in our network who is perceived as arrogant and unfriendly by many of our patients, but his surgical results are far above average when compared to the results of others (yes, we do have that data). If I would require the type of surgery he performs, he would be my number one choice; and still, this does not make him the best doctor, in fact, due to his demeanor, he is often considered the opposite by our patients: a bad doctor.
Fact is: there are no best doctors – not in America, not in Germany, the UK, India or anywhere else in the world no matter what billboards, web pages, and glossy in-flight magazine adverts tell you.
There are however very many good ones. What makes a good doctor depends highly on the patient’s needs and expectations. This is different for everyone.
When my patients ask me for the best doctor, I usually ask them: what exactly are your needs? What are your expectations? The aim is to find a doctor that is right for the patient’s requirements.
Doing this can lead to a doctor/patient match that is so ideal the patient may just walk away feeling satisfied in having met the Best Doctor, after all.
Visit us to learn more about medical treatment in Germany
The days that the family general practitioner decided which medical treatment is ideal for a patient and which specialist the patient will be referred to, are long gone.
Today, patients increasingly make their own decision based on what they perceive is best for them. They will then venture onto a quest trying to find the right physician who will provide them with their desired treatment.
This growing trend can be observed particularly in the medical travel industry.
Again, not a day goes by, that I don’t receive a patient’s request asking for a treatment that might not be ideal for him or her. Yet, due to their internet research, the patients are convinced that their choice is the right one.
A difficult situation… if it is obvious that the treatment the patient seeks is not ideal, it is the only right thing to inform the patient accordingly. On the other hand, it is often difficult to change a patient’s opinion. An opinion which they have developed through their own research. There is a high risk if the attempt is made to change the patient’s mind, that the patient will go elsewhere, until the patient finds what he or she is looking for.
We have struggled with this dilemma for some time, however, we now have made the decision that we will not offer any treatment to a patient, that our doctors believe is not right for them. The rational is simple; a treatment has a higher success rate when it is used for the right indication. Wrong indication and the success rate drops dramatically and with that the rate of unsatisfied patient increases.
Who wants unsatisfied patients?
Thus, and in order to ensure that the patient receives the correct treatment adequate pre-screening is required. Anyone involved in pre-screening a medical tourist should consider it his or her responsibility to adequately preview the patient’s medical file and point the patient towards the appropriate medical doctor.
However, often it is not clear what type of treatment a patient really requires. In these cases, and in order to prevent disappointed patients due to a change of plan when they arrive at the treating center, it may be advisable to establish communication between the doctor in the patient’s home country and the treating physician in the destination country.
Not only does this approach ensure that the medical history and relevant medical data is communicated quickly and professionally between the two experts, it also ensures that the physician at home (the one the patient is most likely going to see after treatment abroad) is aware of the course of treatment from the beginning. The underlying rational for this philosophy is that medical travel does not end when the patient boards the plane to fly home; it ends when the patient has fully recovered.
An example: A patient from the UK travels for bariatric surgery in Germany and receives a gastric sleeve operation. Surgery and initial recovery period go well. Before return home, the patient receives dietary guidelines for the first few weeks, instructions to visit the GP immediately upon return home, what blood test to undergo and at what time, etc. However, the patient is not compliant, does not adhere to the dietary instructions, the GP is unaware of the patient’s medical trip. He discovers a vitamin B12 deficiency some 12 months after the obesity surgery in Germany by accident.
In an ideal world the GP would have been involved in the medical trip already before departure, would have been informed about the medical institution the patient is travelling to, the surgeon performing the procedure, the follow up requirements and contact details of the bariatric surgeon back in Germany, in case of any questions. This is simple and straight forward and yet, in many cases it simply does not happen.
Why does this communication not take place? Most likely because no one actively initiates and drives such communication. The patient doesn’t because he or she might not see the necessity, the GP doesn’t because they might be unaware of the medical travel, and the surgeon abroad doesn’t because he may also be unaware of the need. The German doctor will write a discharge letter in German which concludes their part of the treatment.
A third party might be required to drive and motivate this communication to occur.
This task falls into the area of responsibilities of a good medical travel consultant who should establish communication links between the treating doctor abroad and the follow up physician at home so that the recovery can occur as part of a controlled process rather than being left to chance. In addition, the communication should not rely on highly sophisticated technologies or computer software, but on those technologies that both patient and physician can use with ease and sufficient expertise. Finally, all this needs to be done while maintaining relevant patient data protection regulations.
Other responsibility of a medical travel consultant include assisting the selection of the appropriate specialist, facilitating appointments and treatment schedules, collecting relevant medical data, reviewing the case together with the specialists, managing the actual trip, communicating with family members, and planning the follow up process at home of which communication between the care providers is of high importance.
Only through this holistic approach to medical travel, can medical travel be a safe alternative for treatment at home, should treatment at home not be an option.
With medical travel on the rise, general practitioners will have to be prepared to “deal” with the returning patient. In order to do this, information and communication is required. Both patients and follow up physicians may benefit if a third party who is involved in (and oversees) the entire medical trip drives relevant communication between international healthcare providers. Such increased communication will make medical travel a safe option for the patient, provide GPs with new and high quality alternatives for patient referrals and make the follow up back at home adequate for the treatment the patient has received abroad.
Finally, the local health insurances benefit from such improved communication. It should reduce the risks of patients returning from a “wild medical journey” and developing complications back at home? Such complications may lead to expensive and urgent emergency treatment.
Learn more about medical treatment in Germany